Even though Auth0 provides Authentication and Authorization services in a secure way, its high cost and user inconvenience for small projects prompt us to think about other CIAM or Auth0 alternatives.
If you are looking for an affordable CIAM solution or alternatives to Auth0, we’ve got you covered.
This blog uncovers everything about Auth0, its advantages, disadvantages, competitors, and gives Auth0 alternatives that can help meet your specific requirements in 2025.
Best Auth0 Competitors and Alternatives: A Detailed Comparison
What is Auth0?
Auth0 is a Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) platform used to manage user identities (authentication) and give privileges associated with corresponding identities (authorization).
It manages user identities and access controls securely and enhances user experience. Being owned by Okta and also known as “Auth0 by Okta”, it offers passwordless authentication through WebAuthn and whereas Okta offers passwordless authentication using different methods like factor sequencing, email-based magic links.
Pros and Cons of Auth0
Pros of Auth0
- Easy and Quick Integration: Has a prebuilt universal login page and is compatible with any technology stack, language, or framework.
- Single Sign-On (SSO): Enhances user convenience and security with SSO, allowing users to access multiple applications with one login using protocols like SAML and OAuth 2.0.
- Reliable Security: Protects against malicious attacks with features like bot detection and brute-force protection.
- Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Adds a layer of security by verifying user identities with one-time passwords (via SMS/email) or biometrics (WebAuthn).
- Passwordless Login: Allows users to authenticate easily via one-time codes, fingerprints, or facial recognition.
- Extensibility: Improves user satisfaction through strong community support and ease of use.
Cons of Auth0
- High Cost: Paid plans and integrations are significantly more expensive than competitors, making it costly for small companies that need customization.
- Vendor Lock-In: Its cloud-based dependencies make it difficult and time-consuming to switch to other solutions, locking users into a potentially expensive service as they scale.
- Limited Customization: Customization options are less flexible and powerful than those offered by open-source alternatives.
- Incomplete Documentation: Detailed documentation is often limited to core features, lacking depth for M2M flows and administrative structures.
- API Restrictions: API management is limited and could be enhanced to improve access and management of integrations.
- Third-Party Dependencies: Relies on external services for email and SMS, meaning that an outage with a gateway provider can disrupt its MFA functionality.
What Should We Look for in Auth0 Competitors?
Various factors like the ones listed below should be considered when we want to look in for its alternatives.
- Single Sign-On (SSO) Single Sign-On is an essential feature as it makes access management simpler and improves the user journey by letting people authenticate one time to get into multiple applications. After a successful login, the identity system issues a digital token. This token is then used across all connected services to grant access.
- Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds a needed security step, making certain only authorized people can access data after logging in. For better safety, it’s best that you look for a platform with strong two-factor or adaptive MFA capabilities. An adaptive system can change verification requirements based on user behavior and other risk signals.
- Product's Cost When looking at cost, transparent and tiered pricing is designed for SMBs and mid-market companies. Be cautious of "Contact Us" pricing pages used by large enterprise vendors, as this signals a long sales process. A full assessment of the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) should include the high price of professional services, support, and staff training.
- Security Features A modern security feature to look for is passwordless authentication, which is supported by platforms like Duo. Another important function is the ability to perform device health checks, blocking access from non-compliant computers. Microsoft's access policies can also check a device's compliance status before permitting entry.
- Migration Support Help for moving to a new platform differs between vendors; complex systems from SailPoint require a major IT project and a large budget for services. These large-scale setups often call for specialized skills and assistance from the vendor or a certified partner.
- Customer Support Good customer support is very important for user satisfaction and retaining customers. When setting up a CIAM solution, the quality of your vendor's support is a major consideration. For example, users often describe the support from vendors like Zluri and SailPoint as outstanding and helpful.
10 Best Auth0 Alternatives and Competitors in 2025
1. Infisign
Infisign is an emerging competitor in the identity space. Infisign presents a modern platform built on principles like Zero Trust and passwordless authentication. It is a strong Auth0 alternative for those wanting a modern architecture built to avoid technical debt.
The platform is designed as a complete, unified identity security solution. Infisign covers workforce, customer, and even non-human identities.
As a CIAM solution, Infisign’s UniFed removes the risk of user information being leaked with advanced zero-trust and zero-knowledge proof frameworks that allow SSO to be enabled through federation, SAML, and OIDC. It also enables access to legacy, web-based, and on-prem applications using SSO.
Features:
- Zero Trust Framework: Modern architecture is built on Zero Trust, passwordless, and SSI principles.
- Single Sign On: Make sure that users are able to sign on to your full tech stack in one go using passwordless authentication, social logins, and various other types of authentication.
- Automated User Provisioning: Automated user lifecycle management based on attributes or roles you assign automates provisioning, reducing admin costs significantly.
- SCIM Provisioning: This automates the creation and management of customer accounts across your entire tech stack, allowing for consistent data and saving administrative effort.
- HRIS Integrations: Automatically manage the access rights of internal staff who use the CIAM software, ensuring that permissions are always aligned with their current job role and status.
- Impersonation: Allows you to temporarily grant regular users admin capabilities in cases of emergency, where the same is requested.
- Attribute-Based Access Control: Attribute-based access control allows you to add and remove hundreds of users to specific tools based on attributes you select, like location, IP address, or even role.
- Adaptive MFA: Makes use of adaptive MFA that grants access based on risk and device conditions. Allows you to use biometrics, OTPs, device passkeys, and QR codes for quick and secure authentication.
- Brute Force Protection: Comes with brute force protection like IP whitelisting and login thresholds
- A Complete Identity Security Solution: Unified platform covering Workforce IAM, CIAM, PAM, and IGA.
Pros:
- A zero-trust framework built from the ground up makes it almost entirely hackerproof
- Has multiple API + SDK integrations, making it easy to use with existing tech stack
- Presents a uniquely comprehensive vision for a unified platform covering CIAM, Workforce IAM, PAM, and IGA from a single vendor.
Cons:
- Has a slight learning curve initially.
2. SailPoint
SailPoint is an established leader in the identity security market. It is particularly dominant in the Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) field. It serves as a good Auth0 alternative for businesses whose main driver is governance over a pure developer-first experience.
This alternative to Auth0 also supplies a full identity security platform, including its main SaaS product, Identity Security Cloud.
Features:
- Unmatched, market-leading depth in Identity Governance and Administration (IGA).
- Powerful AI-driven automation for lifecycle management and compliance.
- Highly scalable architecture proven to handle large, complex enterprise environments.
- Has analytics and reporting tools to demonstrate compliance with regulations like SOX, HIPAA, and GDPR.
Pros:
- Recognized for excellent customer service and partnership, with attentive account teams invested in customer goals.
- Benefits from a mature, global ecosystem of implementation partners for deploying in complex environments.
Cons:
- High total cost of ownership makes it prohibitively expensive and a non-starter for most small and mid-sized businesses.
- Has a non-intuitive administrative interface with a steep learning curve
3. Ping Identity
Ping Identity is a long-standing and highly respected leader in the access management field. After its merger with ForgeRock, it gained strong CIAM and developer-centered API capabilities.
The platform is known for its flexibility. It gives exceptional support for complex hybrid and on-premise environments. This is a very important requirement for large businesses. This positions it as one of the top-tier enterprise Auth0 alternatives.
Features:
- Superior support for complex hybrid, on-premise, and cloud deployments.
- Powerful no-code orchestration engine (PingOne DaVinci) for building secure user journeys.
- Recognized market leader in Access Management with deep support for open standards.
- Includes PingDirectory, a high-performance, scalable directory service for storing and managing user identities.
Pros:
- Considered a leader in its implementation of open standards like SAML and OIDC, ensuring high interoperability.
- Delivers a smooth, frictionless, and reliable authentication experience for end-users.
Cons:
- Potential for short-term uncertainty regarding product roadmaps and support due to the ongoing integration with ForgeRock.
- Reports of slow technical support response times present a potential risk for a mission-critical service.
4. OneLogin
OneLogin is a direct competitor in the access management space, is a top Auth0 alternative known for its simplicity.
Now part of One Identity, It supplies strong core IAM features, including SSO and an adaptive authentication engine. However, user-reported reliability issues are a key concern to investigate.
Features:
- Highly user-friendly and intuitive interface for both admins and end-users.
- Strong core IAM features include SSO, MFA, and user lifecycle management.
- HR-Driven Identity automates user provisioning from HR systems.
- Has SmartFactor Authentication, an adaptive engine that uses machine learning to adjust security based on risk.
Pros:
- Has transparent and flexible à la carte pricing, allowing customers to tailor purchases to specific needs.
- Ideal for mid-sized organizations due to its combination of strong features, ease of use, and flexible pricing.
Cons:
- Plagued by user reports of service outages and reliability issues, a major concern for critical infrastructure.
- The OneLogin Protect mobile app receives negative feedback for being cumbersome, especially during new phone setup.
5. Duo Security
Duo Security, now part of Cisco, is a dominant leader in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). It acts as a good Auth0 alternative for businesses that want to add best-in-class, low-difficulty MFA to their applications.
Its brand is synonymous with its popular push-based MFA. The platform has also expanded to a wider Zero Trust product. A key differentiator is its device trust capability. This feature performs health checks on endpoints and blocks access from non-compliant devices.
Features:
- Best-in-class user experience, widely seen as the simplest MFA solution.
- Powerful device trust and health checks to apply Zero Trust policies.
- Extensive range of authentication methods, including phishing-resistant Verified Duo Push.
- Allows secure, VPN-less remote access to private, on-premise applications in its Premier tier.
Pros:
- Known for rapid and simple deployment, allowing organizations to achieve a faster time-to-value.
- Backed by Cisco's global infrastructure, it is a highly reliable, scalable, and enterprise-grade solution.
Cons:
- Carries a premium price tag, which can be expensive for large organizations or those needing advanced features.
- The free tier is highly restricted to 10 users, making it unsuitable for most businesses beyond a brief evaluation.
6. Oracle IAM
Oracle's Identity and Access Management (IAM) suite is a large portfolio from a global enterprise software titan.
For businesses already using Oracle's wider ecosystem, it is the most logical alternative to a standalone CIAM platform like Auth0. This Auth0 competitor’s primary value comes from the deep, native connection to Oracle databases and applications, which Auth0 cannot match.
This Auth0 alternative is also exceptionally powerful and scalable. Oracle IAM gives strong support for complex on-premise and hybrid deployments. This power comes at the cost of extreme complexity, a clunky UI, and a high total cost of ownership.
Features:
- Unbeatable, smooth connection for existing Oracle customers.
- Extremely powerful, scalable, and customizable for large global businesses.
- Complete governance capabilities on par with dedicated IGA leaders.
- Includes multiple high-performance directory services like Oracle Unified Directory (OUD) for scalable identity storage.
Pros:
- Has strong support for managing complex on-premise and hybrid cloud environments.
- It is a mature, feature-rich solution capable of meeting any dependency or requirement in a large enterprise.
Cons:
- Widely criticized for a clunky, outdated, and non-intuitive user interface that is difficult to navigate.
- Designed to work best within the Oracle ecosystem, promoting vendor lock-in and creating challenges for multi-vendor IT strategies.
7. JumpCloud
JumpCloud is an open directory platform and a modern, cloud-based alternative to Microsoft Active Directory. .
The Auth0 competitor is beloved by IT admins in SMEs for consolidating directory services, Single Sign-On, MFA, and device management.
This lessens tool sprawl and cost. One the whole, JumpCloud is a top Auth0 alternative for companies that need to manage a mix of macOS, Windows, and Linux devices alongside user identities.
Features:
- Unified platform for identity, access, and multi-OS device management.
- Excellent for heterogeneous environments (macOS, Windows, and Linux).
- Flexible and transparent pricing with a generous free tier for up to 10 users.
- Includes a built-in remote access tool for on-demand IT support without needing a separate solution.
Pros:
- It is a cloud-native, agent-based model that is perfectly suited for securely managing a distributed, remote workforce.
- Customer support teams are frequently described as responsive, helpful, and open to user feedback.
Cons:
- May lack the extreme depth of features found in best-of-breed point solutions for PAM, IGA, or advanced MDM.
- Built-in reporting and analytics capabilities are often considered basic, sometimes requiring data export for detailed analysis.
8. CyberArk
CyberArk is a global leader in Privileged Access Management (PAM). It is a top Auth0 alternative when the main security concern is protecting privileged accounts, not just customer access.
This Auh0 competitor’s IAM and CIAM abilities are extensions of its world-class security mission, which can appeal to security-first buyers. Its entire platform is built on a PAM-centric worldview.
The company expanded into the wider workforce and customer access space through the acquisition of Idaptive. When assessing CyberArk, customers are buying into a platform where every identity is seen as a potential attack vector.
Features:
- Unmatched, gold-standard leader in Privileged Access Management (PAM).
- Excellent for audit and compliance in highly regulated environments.
- A complete platform that includes endpoint privilege control and secrets management.
- Features Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) to enforce least privilege and remove local admin rights from user devices.
Pros:
- Invaluable for meeting stringent audit and compliance mandates due to detailed session recording and logging.
- Entire platform is built on core Zero Trust principles like least privilege, explicit verification, and assuming breach.
Cons:
- Can create a slow and cumbersome user experience with frequent timeouts, impacting productivity.
- Broader IAM/CIAM solutions are newer additions and may be less mature than its core PAM offerings.
9. Zluri
Zluri entered the market with a unique method, starting as a SaaS Management Platform (SMP).
Unlike developer-centered CIAM tools, its foundation is a powerful discovery engine for finding Shadow IT. It has since made a logical expansion into identity governance.
This makes Zluri an ideal Auth0 alternative if the primary business problem is discovering and governing access to a large, unknown landscape of SaaS applications.
Features:
- Best-in-class SaaS discovery engine to uncover Shadow IT.
- Unique combination of SaaS cost optimization and Identity Governance.
- Exceptionally responsive and collaborative customer support.
- Has an 'employee app store' for self-service access requests through tools like Slack, with automated approval workflows.
Pros:
- Saves significant IT time and manual effort by automating onboarding, offboarding, and access review workflows.
- The platform interface is widely regarded as user-friendly and intuitive, making it easy to manage.
Cons:
- Integrations can be limited or immature, a key risk that requires thorough validation before purchase.
- A slow, 24-hour data refresh rate can cause issues and confusion for real-time automation and workflows.
10. Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra ID, formerly Azure AD, is the default identity provider for the entire Microsoft commercial cloud ecosystem. For the millions of businesses in the Microsoft ecosystem, it is the default, low-difficulty Auth0 alternative.
For businesses invested in the Microsoft stack, Entra ID is the path of least resistance. It is also an extremely cost-effective choice. This Auth0 competitor’s greatest strength is its smooth connection with Microsoft 365.
Features:
- Unbeatable value and smooth connection for Microsoft customers.
- Powerful, market-leading security features like Conditional Access and PIM.
- Excellent support for hybrid environments spanning on-premise Active Directory and the cloud.
- Provides Identity Protection (P2 license) to detect risks like leaked credentials and trigger automated remediation.
Pros:
- Highly scalable and reliable, trusted to handle the identity needs of the world's largest organizations.
- Has a reliable value proposition by bundling vast functionality into existing Microsoft 365 licenses.
Cons:
- Has complex licensing tiers, and its costs and features are difficult to understand, with critical security locked in premium plans.
- Administrative changes can sometimes take several minutes to propagate, affecting agility.
Infisign UniFed: The Best Auth0 Alternative for Stronger Security
Choosing Infisign over the several Auth0 alternatives is a clear choice for businesses seeking a cost-effective and modern identity management solution.
Infisign simplifies customer identity management with features like automated user provisioning, directory sync, SSO, and social logins, making it accessible even for teams without deep technical expertise.
Infisign also comes with:
- AI Access Assist: Helps security teams efficiently manage access for a large volume of customers and detect anomalous behavior that could indicate account takeover attempts.
- Attribute-Based Access Control: Allows highly granular permissions for diverse customer segments, such as granting access to premium content based on a "subscription-tier" attribute.
- Adaptive MFA: Strengthens security against customer account takeover by challenging high-risk logins, while allowing an easy, low-interruption experience for legitimate users.
- SSO That Can be Set Up in Under 4 Hours: Implement SSO in under four hours to significantly reduce development overhead and accelerate the time-to-market for new customer-facing digital products.
- 6000+ API + SDK Integrations: This extensive library allows easy and secure integration across a diverse ecosystem of third-party and homegrown applications that a customer may need to access.
- Conditional Access: Access can be granted or denied based on real-time context, such as location or device compliance, providing major defense against fraudulent sign-in attempts
Our architecture is built on a zero-knowledge proof framework, which removes the risk of passwords being leaked and unauthorized access.
Want to know more? Try Infisign for free!
FAQs on Auth0 Alternatives
What is better than Auth0?
The best Auth0 alternative is a choice that depends on a company's specific priorities. For example, a platform like Infisign or SailPoint is a better choice for businesses that need deep identity governance for compliance. In contrast, a vendor like Duo Security is a better choice if the highest priority is a simple experience.
Is there an Auth0 alternative that is cost-effective?
Yes, there are several cost-effective alternatives to Auth0, with Infisign Unifed being a notable option that provides a unified platform for both customer and workforce identity management, often at a more competitive price point. Other popular and budget-friendly choices include open-source solutions like Keycloak, which offers a free self-hosted version.
Is Auth0 deprecated?
Auth0 as a platform is not deprecated; however, specific features within it, such as legacy Rules and Hooks for customization, are being phased out in favor of a newer system called Actions. While the main Auth0 service is active, users of older features must migrate to the new systems to maintain functionality.
Is there a free version of Auth0?
Yes, Auth0 offers a free plan that is suitable for development and small-scale projects. This complimentary plan supports a generous number of monthly active users and includes essential features like social logins and branded login forms.
